5/19/2023 0 Comments Books of blood volume 2I think it’s more about how little horror we’ve actually had since the Books of Blood came out in ‘86 or ‘87. That’s the approach that we decided to take.Ĭlive, what is it like for you, at this point, to see your material turned into these different projects and still have such an interesting, new and different point of view, from various filmmakers?īARKER: I don’t know what it says. The stories don’t rely on each other, but they cross pollinate just so, in a way that buoys the whole film. And then, as the film started to coalesce and it was time to commingle the storylines, the only point of reference I could think of that would really help was Pulp Fiction, the Tarantino film, which is not a horror movie but it’s a great anthology movie. I went off with a writer named Adam Simon and fashioned these into script form. Was it hard to figure out exactly what you wanted to focus for this, what you wanted to add or change, and how you wanted to approach this?īRAGA: Most of the DNA was laid as Clive and I decided to take the title story from the first story in the first volume as one of the stories, and then there were two other amazing ideas that Clive had been thinking about for quite some time. We created a lot of narrative, just by being with each other. We have a body of narratives, which are Clive and Brannon’s Books of Blood. Not only did we talk about stories which are written but we started to create new stories. CLIVE BARKER: It turned out to be even bigger than we thought it was going to be.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |